Analysis: What Cory Booker's 'Spartacus' moment at the Kavanaugh hearing accomplished

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's contribution to a 2002 email chain with the subject line "racial profiling" was no smoking gun.

Republicans even argued – after it became public – it showed Kavanaugh in a good light, though Democrats disputed that.

Yet because the emails were relatively benign, Sen. Cory Booker's defiance – to the point of daring the GOP to try to expel him – of rules that had declared them "confidential" emphasized what he called a "sham process" developed by Republicans to cut off scrutiny while rapidly advance Kavanaugh's nomination through the Senate Judiciary Committee.

It earned Booker, a New Jersey Democrat and potential candidate for president in 2020, applause from groups battling Kavanaugh's nomination, some of whom have complained about a less than spirited effort at the hearings.

His Democratic colleagues also promised to back him up if he was punished for breaking the rules, leading Booker to declare, "This is about the closest I'll probably ever have in my life to an 'I am Spartacus' moment."

The GOP response evolved. Initially, a senator questioned whether Booker "deserves to sit on this committee or in the Senate" for what he did. Then the documents he wanted were cleared for release, so they were no longer confidential when Booker put them out. So the response shifted to mocking Booker's "Spartacus" comment and arguing he was grandstanding over nothing.

Booker's team responded by continuing to release more "confidential" documents about issues such as affirmative action in university admissions and Kavanaugh's dealings with a Republican who hacked Senate Democrats' computers throughout the day.

There was no sign, however, any of it had an effect on the outcome of the nomination.

The emails were among thousands of documents relating to Kavanaugh's service in President George W. Bush's White House that were labeled "committee confidential" by the panel's chairman, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

They show the administration in the months after 9/11 talking about how to increase screening of passengers at airports. Kavanaugh wrote in one email that he and others favor “effective security measures that are race neutral,” a phrase highlighted by his supporters. But he also appeared to accept the need to start screening before comprehensive standards to prevent profiling were developed, which Booker questioned. 

As a committee member, Booker was allowed to read the emails, but he could not talk about or share them unless he asked for permission in advance. That, of course, would have tipped Republicans that Booker would raise profiling at the hearings.

On Wednesday night, Booker broke the first rule, reading from the emails before asking Kavanaugh what he thinks about profiling today. Kavanaugh asked to see the email and Booker did not provide it. 

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, objected. He said Booker should not be able to ask a witness about a document without the witness being able to see it, and that Booker was quoting a confidential document.

Lee, who has worked closely with Booker on sentencing reform legislation despite their wide differences on other issues, offered to work with the Democrat to make the document public, and Booker thanked him.

Attitudes were more testy the next morning. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, complained that it was "outrageous" Democrats would try to question Kavanaugh about a document he could not see, and also that they would not respect a decision President Bush and his lawyer had made to keep legal advice he got confidential.

More:Booker releases confidential 'racial profiling' Kavanaugh emails

More:Cory Booker grills Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh

More:Read the confidential Brett Kavanaugh 'racial profiling' emails Cory Booker released

"It's important that we remind one another that there are clear rules about the discussion of confidential material and that there can be consequences to the violations," Cornyn said.

Booker responded by criticizing the rules and saying he would make the emails public even if that meant he faced expulsion, calling it an act of "civil disobedience." Several Democratic colleagues said they would stand with him. 

Cornyn said it was "irresponsible and dangerous" for a senator to decide to release classified information "because you happen to disagree with the classification decision."

"Running for president is no excuse for violating the rules of the Senate," Cornyn said. At another point, Cornyn read a Senate rule Booker may have violated. Booker challenged him, asking if he was expressing "political bluster or sincere feelings."

"If he feels that I, and now my fellow colleagues who are with me, have violated those rules, if he's not a tempest in a teapot, but sincerely believes that, then bring the charges," he said. 

Speaking to reporters later outside the hearing room, Booker questioned whether Cornyn was trying to bully him, telling the Texan to "bring it" if he wasn't. Those two words morphed into a Twitter hashtag, promoted by his media team. One Tweet combined pictures of Booker with Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi.

Bob Bland, co-chairman of the Women's March, a group that staged a sit-in Thursday at  Grassley's office, released a statement saying: “Senator Booker is modeling exactly what we expect of every member of the Senate: we need to stop Kavanaugh by any means necessary."

Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said Booker's effort highlighted how “shrouded in secrecy” the confirmation process has been even if the emails did not contain a smoking gun that undid Kavanaugh's nomination.  Clarke said the point was that they had been classified to keep Democrats from bringing them up, even though they contained no information that merited secrecy.

“I think this morning was a game-changer,” Clarke said. “What other information is in the hundreds of thousands of documents that haven’t been turned over? There is a looming feeling there is something they’re hiding.”

Booker had to know that expulsion would never happen when he invited it. To begin with, that penalty requires 67 votes, meaning 16 of his fellow Democrats would have to join in the vote.

More importantly, by the time his office distributed the racial profiling email, the committee had worked with administration lawyers and agreed to waived confidentiality.

"We were surprised to learn about Senator Booker's histrionics this morning because we had already told him he could use the documents publicly," Bill Burk, Bush's records representative on Kavanaugh papers, said in a statement.

Booker's office responded by releasing more documents throughout the day.

“Senate Republicans are doing everything they can to distract from their sham process," Booker spokesman Krisitin Lynch said.

“Cory and Senate Democrats were able to shame the committee into agreeing to make last night’s documents publicly available, and Cory publicly released those documents as well as other committee confidential documents today. And he’ll keep releasing them because Republicans are hiding Brett Kavanaugh’s record from the American people,” Lynch said.